Floor Storage
 |
No items matching your keywords were found.
|
No items matching your keywords were found.
Floor Storage
A 106 N sack of grain is hoisted to a storage room 54 m above the ground floor of a grain elevator.?
(a) How much work was done?
_____ J
(b) What is the increase in potential energy of the sack of grain at this height?
_____ J
(c) The rope being used to lift the sack of grain breaks just as the sack reaches the storage room. What kinetic energy does the sack have just before it strikes the ground floor?
_____ J
any help? thank you very much!
work = force * distance
so your force is 106 N times 54m = work
Pe = mgh right? Newtons is already mg, so Pe = 105 * 54
Ke = 0.5mv^2
find your velocity using a motion equation and solve for the rest. You initial velocity is 0...you solve for the final
|
No items matching your keywords were found.
|
No items matching your keywords were found.
|
No items matching your keywords were found.
|
No items matching your keywords were found.
| Account limit of 2098 requests per hour exceeded. |
Pop-Up Floor Storage System-DIY
am starting a residntial garage floor and storage business. I need a cool name that people will remember?
I will be installing cabinets, and doing epoxy and modular flooring. I am trying to come up with a name that says all that, and will be easy to remember
I can't give you any names because Im not that creative. It's your business and I think you should think of the name and have a nice feeling knowing that you created the entire thing on your own. I can give you a few suggestions though.
- Think outside of the box. You can think of a name that is not is looking beyond what you do. Im not that smart and I dont really know what expoxy or modular means.
- Keep your name short. If its too long and people want to recommend you, they should be able to remember it without a hassle. If its too long, then it would be harder to remember
- Do you have a theme? If you do, then find a name that goes around that theme.
I was thinking something like Inside the Box. You can use it if you want, but you might try something different. 
Clear bias against Korean vehicles displayed by many with narrow views. Many a vehicle from all sorts of manufacturers have differeing torque outputs manual versus auto with the majority having LESS torque in the auto (as in recent CA review of Mitsubishi Challenger for one example), and many are higher than a piddling 15Nm difference, the aforementioned Challenger being 50Nm down on torque in an auto. I’d say that Hyundai have simply not developed or sourced a new manual, whereas they have developed the new six speed auto in house (and as mentioned one of only three to have their OWN six speed auto box). As for Accent and Getz allegedly having cracking chassis ‘in the early days’, as another correspondent on CA usually posts ‘please reference’. Many a manufacturer from all parts of the world have recalls and problems with various vehicles at various times. (witness the MASSIVE problems Toyota currently have, including the Pious) As for vehicles Lancer sized, I’d rather a Ford Focus. I’ve had the misfortune to drive a base model Lancer with the boring CVT and useless tiptronic function, and was extremely underwhelmed. As for Santa Fe/Sorento costing more than Captiva. A few reasons I can think of. The Santa Fe/Sorento are larger than a Captiva, have more modern and efficent engines and gearboxes and more useable internal space. On that vein I’ve noticed at the end of more than one CA review the alleged ‘Rivals’. In this case I hardly see the Mitusbishi Outlander as a rival for the Korean cousins, the Outlander is much smaller and has no diesel. Again on similar lines, I’m fairly certain that most of these seven seaters (certainly the alleged ‘rivals named here), have just as little (or less) luggage space when the seven seats are in use. On a negative note for the Santa Fe/Sorento pair (or positive depending on your view) and not mentioned in the review is the lack of anchorage points in the third row seats, which would(should) stop putting the smaller kids who still should be in boosters and proper harnesses if small enough in those seats, and certainly stops the mounting of any car seat back there, which if you have a couple of young children needing proper car seats and then want someone else to use the third row would make the process of access very interesting. I believe the Kluger also does not come with third row anchorages, but can be optioned, don’t know (or care) about the Odyssey. Recently looked closely at the last of the previous Santa Fe, and not needing seven seats am really considering it, because without the seven seats has decent under floor storage. May hold off for a look at IX35, still considering.
LOL… Oh sorry Steph.. When you mentioned Mini I thought you meant a Mini Cooper. I must have been scatterbrained at the time I was reading/writing because now thinking about it, a Mini Cooper wouldn't fit 3 car seats across the back anyway,lol. What sort of Mini Van do you have? We're having trouble deciding between the Odyssey and the Dodge Caravan (we really like the in-floor storage in the Caravans). We haven't actually seen the Odyssey in person but the pictures online are amazing.
As you know, we have a 7 seater SUV and an 8 seater Odyssey. They each have their plusses and minuses. We had seriously considered the Sienna as well. I don't think you can go wrong there either but I like my Odyssey. Drive them both, they feel a bit different. It really came down to the fact that the Odyssey has more leg room on the passenger side. You know, it is nice when my husband's knees don't hit the dashboard when we drive. Anyway… that doesn't interest you guys
Volvo XC90 7 seater SUV (or most 3 row mid sized SUVs)
Pros: “cooler”, lots of seats, ours has great trunk space but some others don't.
Cons: gas mileage, though minivans aren't great either. When you have car seats in the middle row it makes the 3rd row seating pretty unusable. Unless you want to climb over car seats and into the back. Not fun. Not ideal for grandparents
You can put car seats in the back row but then it is difficult to get back and buckle them.
Odyssey:
Pros: 2nd row bucket seating allows for super easy access to back row. Seats 8 people. No other minivan does. There are more LATCH connectors than any other minivan. Double sliding doors. Fold flat back row. Extra, extra deep trunk holds more than a midsized SUV. The under floor storage is great. Kids can get in and out of it easier than an SUV. Easier for grandparents to fit into comfortably, no climbing over anything. Great turning radius. Handles more like a car and definitely not like a giant SUV. Fits in parking spaces. Though it is worth mentioning that our minivan is just a tad longer than our Volvo SUV. The back row splits so you can put just one side or the other down if you are carrying a lot of cargo. The center console in the front can fold down so you can walk from your driver seat all the way to the back of the car without getting out into the pouring Seattle rain (a big plus).
Cons: it isn't as “cool” as an SUV but when we finally made the plunge we wondered what was wrong with us and our egos before because it made daily travel with kids so much easier. Gas mileage. As I mentioned, no minivans get great mileage. Maybe a bit better than a regular SUV but less than a small car or a hybrid. Odyssey doesn't have all wheel drive. Sienna does but only on the top end I believe (though I could be wrong).
How's that?